From 2559ae43f85fda4d563a3c83129d0e40d549b633 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: green <green@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:46:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 2002-12-22 Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
* gcj.texi (Limitations): Add note about org.xml.sax and
org.w3c.dom.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@60411 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---
gcc/java/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
gcc/java/gcj.texi | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/java/ChangeLog b/gcc/java/ChangeLog
index 7567830e88d2..8b4a2178b101 100644
--- a/gcc/java/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/java/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2002-12-22 Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
+
+ * gcj.texi (Limitations): Add note about org.xml.sax and
+ org.w3c.dom.
+
2002-12-20 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* jcf-write.c (generate_bytecode_insns) [SWITCH_EXPR]: Handle case
diff --git a/gcc/java/gcj.texi b/gcc/java/gcj.texi
index 64080cd7b773..a6dc6a2289a7 100644
--- a/gcc/java/gcj.texi
+++ b/gcc/java/gcj.texi
@@ -515,6 +515,17 @@ Sometimes the @code{libgcj} implementation of a method or class differs
from the JDK implementation. This is not always a bug. Still, if it
affects you, it probably makes sense to report it so that we can discuss
the appropriate response.
+
+@item
+@command{gcj} does not currently allow for piecemeal replacement of
+components within @code{libgcj}. Unfortunately, programmers often want
+to use newer versions of certain packages, such as those provided by
+the Apache Software Foundation's Jakarta project. This has forced us
+to place the @code{org.w3c.dom} and @code{org.xml.sax} packages into
+their own libraries, separate from @code{libgcj}. If you intend to
+use these classes, you must link them explicitly with
+@code{-l-org-w3c-dom} and @code{-l-org-xml-sax}. Future versions of
+@command{gcj} may not have this restriction.
@end itemize
@node Extensions
--
GitLab