From e72539ec3e1ca3531a0f7e42cc7cadee147c9d51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: law <law@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 20:15:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix comments/ChangeLog entry for last night's change.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@26320 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---
gcc/ChangeLog | 6 +++---
gcc/flow.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 12b0d4d0ecd3..17658b5ddbf0 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Thu Apr 8 19:20:18 1999 Jeffrey A Law (law@cygnus.com)
Do not try to optimize a aggregate address which has VOIDmode.
Mirrors March 23 change to expand_assignment.
- * flow.c (delete_unreachable_blocks): Do not require an edge to
- be marked with EDGE_FALLTHRU when tidying an edge which connects
- consecutive basic blocks.
+ * flow.c (delete_unreachable_blocks): Do not require EDGE_FALLTHRU
+ for an edge when tidying an edge which connects consecutive basic
+ blocks.
* flow.c (can_delete_label_p): Do not convert a label into a
deleted label here.
diff --git a/gcc/flow.c b/gcc/flow.c
index daf357114bc4..64350b0544bc 100644
--- a/gcc/flow.c
+++ b/gcc/flow.c
@@ -1563,10 +1563,9 @@ delete_unreachable_blocks ()
out edge for the block which ended with the conditional
branch (since we do not create duplicate edges).
- Furthermore, because we create the edge for the jump to the
- label before the fallthrough edge, we will only see the
- jump edge. So we do not want to check that the edge is a
- FALLTHRU edge. */
+ Furthermore, the edge will be marked as a fallthru because we
+ merge the flags for the duplicate edges. So we do not want to
+ check that the edge is not a FALLTHRU edge. */
if ((s = b->succ) != NULL
&& s->succ_next == NULL
&& s->dest == c)
--
GitLab