From f8d0d78ad1b8990f992f4acc411e849cd1185f8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rguenth <rguenth@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:26:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 2002-01-04 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com>
* decl.c (finish_constructor_body): create simple
compound stmt instead of a if(1) { } construct.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@109331 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---
gcc/cp/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
gcc/cp/decl.c | 25 -------------------------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index 9102cbc1bd37..29389f45bdd1 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2002-01-04 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com>
+
+ * decl.c (finish_constructor_body): create simple
+ compound stmt instead of a if(1) { } construct.
+
2006-01-03 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/25492
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 020d96f7fd5d..2f8533412fdb 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -10625,31 +10625,8 @@ finish_constructor_body (void)
static void
begin_destructor_body (void)
{
- tree if_stmt;
tree compound_stmt;
- /* If the dtor is empty, and we know there is not any possible
- way we could use any vtable entries, before they are possibly
- set by a base class dtor, we don't have to setup the vtables,
- as we know that any base class dtor will set up any vtables
- it needs. We avoid MI, because one base class dtor can do a
- virtual dispatch to an overridden function that would need to
- have a non-related vtable set up, we cannot avoid setting up
- vtables in that case. We could change this to see if there
- is just one vtable.
-
- ??? In the destructor for a class, the vtables are set
- appropriately for that class. There will be no non-related
- vtables. jason 2001-12-11. */
- if_stmt = begin_if_stmt ();
-
- /* If it is not safe to avoid setting up the vtables, then
- someone will change the condition to be boolean_true_node.
- (Actually, for now, we do not have code to set the condition
- appropriately, so we just assume that we always need to
- initialize the vtables.) */
- finish_if_stmt_cond (boolean_true_node, if_stmt);
-
compound_stmt = begin_compound_stmt (0);
/* Make all virtual function table pointers in non-virtual base
@@ -10658,8 +10635,6 @@ begin_destructor_body (void)
initialize_vtbl_ptrs (current_class_ptr);
finish_compound_stmt (compound_stmt);
- finish_then_clause (if_stmt);
- finish_if_stmt (if_stmt);
/* And insert cleanups for our bases and members so that they
will be properly destroyed if we throw. */
--
GitLab