Skip to content
  • Jan Beulich's avatar
    x86: drop {X,Y,Z}MMWORD_MNEM_SUFFIX · d2224064
    Jan Beulich authored
    They aren't really useful (anymore?): The conflicting operand size check
    isn't applicable to any insn validly using respective memory operand
    sizes (and if they're used wrongly, another error would result), and the
    logic in process_suffix() can be easily changed to work without them.
    
    While re-structuring conditionals in process_suffix() also drop the
    CMPXCHG8B special case in favor of a NoRex64 attribute in the opcode
    table.
    d2224064
To find the state of this project's repository at the time of any of these versions, check out the tags.