From be706ae3eeed9c41d4df385c918999cff8893c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ron Williams <ron.williams.redox@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:10:19 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix table

---
 content/news/this-month-240229.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/news/this-month-240229.md b/content/news/this-month-240229.md
index 60e1fa6a..a87e5105 100644
--- a/content/news/this-month-240229.md
+++ b/content/news/this-month-240229.md
@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ and compared that against copying from the raw disk scheme, and from the disk sc
 The following results were observed.
 
 |  Block size  | `/dev/zero`  |   raw disk   |    RedoxFS   |
-| ------------ | ------------ | ------------ | ------------ |
+| :----------: | :----------: | :----------: | :----------: |
 |     4KiB     |  110 MiB/s   |   22 MiB/s   |   6 MiB/s    |
 |     4Mib     |   1.6 GiB/s  |  600 MiB/s   |  170* MiB/s  |
-*After the addition of records described below.
 
+*After the addition of records described below.
 (Some results omitted)
 
 In order to separate the size of RedoxFS read/write operations from the disk block size,
-- 
GitLab